Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
New System Laundry, LLC v. Alsco Inc
as 2:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
New System Laundry, LLC
Defendant:
Alsco Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chambers v. Alsco Inc.
as 8:2013cv02292
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chambers
Defendant:
Alsco Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MCVAY v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv60010
Plaintiff:
KAREN MCVAY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. , ARMSTRONG PUMP, INC. , AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McVay v. Armstrong International Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv10001
Plaintiff:
Karen McVay
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Armstrong Pump, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Asebstos Action- Refiled as Case No. 1:13-cv-10001
as 1:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Karen McVay
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Armstrong Pump, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wilson v. Alsco, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Alsco, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LWD PRP Group v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
LWD PRP Group
Defendant:
ACF Industries, LLC, Accent Strip, Inc, Adena Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
