Cases 41 - 48 of 48
San Joaquin Motel and Hotel Pr, et al v. City of Stockton, et al
as 10-15235
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN MOTEL AND HOTEL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, ARVIN PATEL, JAWAID AKHTAR and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAIR AFZL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, GARY PODESTO, STEVE PINKERTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Moore v. Patel et al
as 3:2008cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lashundra F. Moore and Lashundra F. Moore
Defendant:
Anil Patel, Sleep Inn Hotel, Choice Hotels International and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
NJRL3, LLC et al v. NORTH STAR HOLDING L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv04893
Plaintiff:
NJRL3, LLC, NJRL3, LLC, JAY SONECHA and others
Defendant:
NORTH STAR HOLDING L.P., NORTHSTAR MANAGEMENT, INC., ANIL PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ramada Worldwide, Inc. v. Axita Corporation et al
as 5:2008mc00082
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Axita Corporation, Anil Patel, Praful Patel and others
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. AXITA Corporation
as 2:2008ms00067
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
AXITA Corporation, Praful Patel, Ravi Patel and others
YASH RAJ FILMS (USA) INC. v. SUBZI BAZAAR INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02840
Plaintiff:
YASH RAJ FILMS (USA) INC.
Defendant:
SUBZI BAZAAR INC., HARMEET NAYYAR, RURIPAM VIDEO & VARIETY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC et al v. ANUJA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01841
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DUNKIN' DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant:
ANUJA, INC., ARVIND PATEL, DIPAK PATEL and others
Cross Claimant:
ANUJA, INC. and ARVIND PATEL
Cross Defendant:
ANIL PATEL, DIPAK PATEL and ANAND PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
