Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Banda v. JR Rolando Noel Loera Arceo et al
as 7:2018cv00225
Defendant:
JR ROLANDO NOEL LOERA ARCEO, OCTAVIO TOVAR TORRES and Jr Rolando Noel Lo Arceo
Plaintiff:
JAIR RAIMUNDO BANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abel Contreras et al v. XPO Cartage, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
Abimael Hernandez, Jose F. Castro, Manuel D. Martinez Mejia and others
Defendant:
XPO Port Services, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Port Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tang et al v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
as 2:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
Genet B. Amare, Arsenio Angus, III, Mark Anthony Arboleda and others
702) 737-7712 (fax:
Kanie Kastroll
Petitioner:
Byung Sim
Defendant:
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ARCEO v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00929
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E ARCEO
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Arceo v. Audrey King
as 18-15434
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY A. ARCEO
Respondent - Appellee:
AUDREY KING
Arceo et al v. US Xpress Inc
as 4:2017cv05192
Plaintiff:
Pedro Arceo and Maria Contreras-Arceo
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Arceo v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv23821
Plaintiff:
Roberto Arceo and Zenen Nieblas
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc., Las 4 A Delivery Corporation and Alexander Ortega
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Arceo et al
as 3:2017cv00397
Defendant:
Osbaldo Arceo and Huffaker Hills Unit No. 2 Residence Association,
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
