Cases 41 - 50 of 180
Austin v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 2:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Marva Austin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Supercenter #1682
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James v. Delta Motors, LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Tamron James
Defendant:
Delta Motors, LLC and Austin's Auto Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sacra v. Haga et al
as 7:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Sacra, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Austin H. Haga, Sgt. Marc E. I. Bilbrey, C/O Jeffrey S. Bemis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Austin et al
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Marsha King and Torian Williams
Defendant:
Marva Austin and Kim Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Shaw v. Austin
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Bernadetta Shaw
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Austin et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
William David Jones
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Defense Logistics Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
