Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Marc Goodman v. Praxair, Incorporated
as 11-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC B. GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED and PRAXAIR SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Marroquin v. Goodman, et al.
as 3:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Marco Marroquin
Defendant:
B. Goodman, D.B. Silva, C. Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marroquin v. Goodman, et al.
as 1:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
Marco Marroquin
Defendant:
B. Goodman, D.B. Silva, C. Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Elpida Memoray Inc et al
as 5:2010cv03738
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Defendant:
Elpida Memory Inc, Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions, Inc, Fidelis Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GOODMAN v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv86809
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B. GOODMAN
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GOODMAN v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89333
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B. GOODMAN
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Goodman v. Numonyx B.V.
as 3:2009cv04243
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Defendant:
Numonyx B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Goodman v. Numonyx B.V.
as 5:2009cv02170
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Defendant:
Numonyx B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Goodman v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv20813
Plaintiff:
Noah B. Goodman
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation and Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00262
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
