Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 209
DALE JR. v. BOWEN
as 1:2021cv00044
Plaintiff: ROY DALE, JR
Defendant: JUDGE ROONEY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00991
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Edward Earl Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAWRENCE v. KEMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR BOWEN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, LIEUTENANT KING and others
Plaintiff: ROOSEVELT LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00036
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Ray Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowen v. Porsche Cars N.A., Inc.
as 1:2021cv00471
Defendant: Porsche Cars N.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: Kent Bowen and Kathleen Darnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Evans III v. Bowen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00121
Petitioner: Manvester Evans III
Respondent: Warden Timothy Bowen
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant: Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff: Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harpo-Brown v. Craig et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00137
Defendant: Shawn E. Lagrua, J. Randal Hall, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff: Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Sealock
as 1:2020cv03413
Plaintiff: Michael Bernard Bowens
Defendant: Maranda Sealock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01010
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?