Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Brunker v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
as 3:2016cv03399
Plaintiff:
Jodi Brunker
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
as 3:2015cv03225
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 3:2015cv02402
Plaintiff:
Kellie Smith
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Kenton Rainey, Benson H. Fairow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greer v. City of Hayward et al
as 3:2015cv02307
Defendant:
City of Hayward and Bay Area Rapid Transit
Plaintiff:
Joseph James Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
as 3:2015cv01313
Plaintiff:
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Asberry, II v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District ("BART") et al
as 3:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Asberry, II
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District ("BART")
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ho v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District
as 3:2015cv01128
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ho , Charles Hardman , Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burleson v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) et al
as 3:2014cv05462
Plaintiff:
Albert James Burleson, Jr.
Defendant:
Darnell Bussey, Myron Lee, Kenton Rainey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
