Cases 41 - 50 of 533
Boehm v. Secretary Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00623
Petitioner:
Christopher Boehm
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boehm et al v. Podraza
as 2:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm and Paul Spinelli
Defendant:
Joel Podraza doing business as Mil City Collectibles
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BOEHM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18032
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DANIEL BOEHM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. LaPorte County Superior Court No 1 et al
as 3:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
LaPorte County Superior Court No 1, Jamie Oss, David K Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Champion et al v. Boehm et al
as 2:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion, Asif Lundstrom, Todd Horne and others
Defendant:
Michael Boehm and Hosting Response, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joshua Champion v. Does
as 2:2022cv05840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion, Nick Miller, Rosie Clarke and others
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Michael Boehm and Hosting Response, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harun El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARUN AL-RASHID EL
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, JIM KENNY, GOEHRING, RUTTER & BOEHM and others
Dorgay v. Syndom et al
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Robert Dorgay
Defendant:
Denise Syndom, Neil Thoreson, Angelique Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Neogen Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06232
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Neogen Corporation, John E. Adent, James C. Borel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
