Cases 41 - 50 of 137
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48158
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01576
Petitioner:
Brian Clark
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22680
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13257
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04443
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRIAN CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44069
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41238
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Chris Haines, Greg Mendenhall, UPMC Pinnacle and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Riley and Thomas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08870
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adinolfe v. United Technologies Corporation
as 9:2010cv80840
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adinolfe, Jolynn Adinolfe, Regnier Alexis and others
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation doing business as Pratt & Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
