Cases 41 - 50 of 67
McCoy v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2018cv01546
Defendant:
C. O. Ferguson, Administrator Kim Wolfe, Capt. Carl Aldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Chawntel McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv05268
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE MOORE
Defendant:
C/O JOHN DOE 1, C/O TAYLOR, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murzike v. Kelley et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
C/O Braswell, C/O John Doe and Officer J. D. Kelley
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upshaw v. PA Dept of Corr. at SCI Benner et al
as 1:2018cv02077
Defendant:
PA Dept of Corr. at SCI Benner, C/O John Doe #1 and C/O John Doe #2
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Upshaw Upshaw and Lafayette Upshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrell v. WRJ et al
as 2:2018cv01305
Defendant:
C/O Jane Doe, Execcutive Director Farmer, Administrator King and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warden et al
as 1:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jamie R. Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Missingman, Lt. Seaba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scruggs v. Miller et al
as 3:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Sgt Miller, Sgt Sin Clair, C O Washington and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Enloe et al
as 1:2016cv09855
Plaintiff:
Darren L. Hopkins
Defendant:
Donald Enloe, John Doe, Sergent Kunde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bailey et al
as 1:2016cv05780
Plaintiff:
Henry Johnson
Defendant:
C/O Bailey, Sgt. Thomas, Sgt. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Suffolk County Sheriff et al
as 2:2016cv01871
Defendant:
Srg Kevin Daly, Mr. Vincent F. DeMarco, c/o John Doe #1 and others
Mc-Call-ee:
Lt. McCauley
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Stewart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
