Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 70
McWhite v. Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff: Jonathan McWhite
Defendant: Ms. Sgt. Marshall, Mr. Sgt. Felix, Richmond City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imani v. Woody
as 2:2010cv00292
Plaintiff: Imani Imani
Defendant: C. T. Woody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Woody et al
as 1:2010cv00373
Plaintiff: Edward Roy Thompson
Defendant: C. T. Woody, Jr., Colonel Barnett, Captian Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - None: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Camp v. Richmond Sheriff's Office" Sherrif C. T. Woody, Jr.
as 2:2009cv00626
Plaintiff: Walter Camp
Defendant: Richmond Sheriff's Office - Sherrif C. T. Woody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Artis v. Woody
as 1:2009cv01207
Petitioner: Jerome Artis, Jr.
Respondent: C. T. Woody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Woody
as 2:2009cv00529
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Butler
Defendant: C. T. Woody, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrahim Jabbar v. C. Woody We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7929
Plaintiff - Appellant: IBRAHIM ABDULLAH JABBAR
Defendant - Appellee: C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, CAPTAIN ROBINSON, Medical Dept. Sup., DR. FURMAN, Head Doctor, RCJ and others
Jones et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2009cv00570
Plaintiff: Angela Jones, Angela Jones, Shaniqua Gary and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, City of Richmond, C. T. Woody, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bagwell v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 1:2009cv00925
Plaintiff: Terry L. Bagwell
Defendant: Richmond City Jail, C. T. Woody and Cherly Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?