Cases 41 - 50 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Valdez v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jose Portillo Valdez
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. doing business as Carmax #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Branden Flynn v. Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02065
Plaintiff:
Branden Flynn
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alexandra Reid v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., et al
as 22-55261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDRA REID, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC., CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES WEST COAST, INC. and DOES, 1-100, Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Edgina Hendrix-Smith v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 22-10176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDGINA HENDRIX-SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
