Cases 41 - 50 of 278
Padilla v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Jennifer Meaker, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06454
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Date Services, Inc.
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Brian Watson, Sterling NCP FF, LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark A Roberts
Interpleader:
800 HOYT LLC, WDC Holdngs, LLC, PLW Capital 1, LLC and others
Martin v. Haling et al
as 1:2021cv05494
Plaintiff:
Suzy Martin
Defendant:
Susan Haling, Michelle Casey, Donald Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey v. Grunwald et al
as 3:2021cv50377
Plaintiff:
Lashaun Casey
Defendant:
A. Grunwald, M. Gaston and T. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzner v. Cradle Adoption Partners NFP
as 1:2021cv05147
Plaintiff:
Casey Fitzner
Defendant:
Cradle Adoption Partners NFP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casey v. L J Ross Associates, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04906
Plaintiff:
Susan Casey, f/k/a Laffey, Susan Casey and Laffey
Defendant:
L J Ross Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wakefield v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00867
Plaintiff:
Eric Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Christopher Police Department, Marie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Griffith et al
as 2:2021cv02150
Defendant:
. Mounce, Macon County Courthouse, Corey Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Todd Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
