Cases 41 - 50 of 129
Beaudoin, Sr. v. Baker
as 1:2020cv11187
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker
Plaintiff:
John Paul Beaudoin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
World Gym, Inc. et al v. Baker
as 1:2020cv11162
Plaintiff:
BF of Springfield, Inc., BF of Lowell, Inc., BF of Danvers, LLC and others
Defendant:
Charles D Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 4:2020cv10916
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv10916
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. Baker
as 20-1428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL SCHMITT, on behalf of himself, resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Ingrao v. Stoppelman et al
as 3:2020cv02753
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Ingrao
Defendant:
Charles "Lanny" Baker, Jeremy Stoppelman, Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman and others
MCCARTHY et al v. BAKER et al
as 1:2020cv10701
Plaintiff:
TROY CITY TACTICAL LLC, LAURIE WARNER, WILLIAM R. BIEWENGA and others
Defendant:
CHARLES D. BAKER, MATTHEW SONNABEND, ROBERT F. RUFO and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., GUN OWNERS ACTION LEAGUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedrone, LLC et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv40041
Plaintiff:
Gun Owners of America, Brophy's Fine Firearms, Inc., Cedrone, LLC and others
Defendant:
Governor Charles Duane Baker, Jr and Attorney General Maura T. Healey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Baker
as 20-1376
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES D. BAKER
Petitioner:
JANE DOE, C.W. /Imprisoned Somewhere
Petitioner / Appellant:
JANE DOE, S.W.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
