Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Dominguez et al v. Law Office of Lourdes Armengol, P.A.
as 1:2010cv21370
Plaintiff:
Otniel Dominguez and Alexandra Dominguez
Defendant:
Law Office of Lourdes Armengol, P.A., Attorney and Counselor at Law and Lourdes Armengol
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walter Hayes v. W. Morrison
as 09-2395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER D. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR. and others
Sizemore v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2009cv01007
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey David Sizemore
Defendant:
J. Wilcox, B. Hanna, P. Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clement Gates Dugan & May, Counselors at Law, LLC v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv06718
Plaintiff:
Clement Gates Dugan & May, Counselors at Law, LLC
Defendant:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dagen v. Hummer et al
as 1:2007cv00964
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dagen
Defendant:
Wayne (I) G. Hummer, Jr., Wayne G. Hummer, Jr., Reese, Pugh, Samley, Wagenseller & Mecum, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Group Health Care Plan of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and Affiliates v. Ashley et al
as 2:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Group Health Care Plan of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and Affiliates and Group Health Care Plan of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and Affiliates
Defendant:
Floyd J Ashley, Don H Evans, Don H. Evans, Attorneys & Counselors at Law and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
