Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Moore v. U.S. Marshalls et al
as 1:2012cv10025
Plaintiff:
Norvell T Moore
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D. Downey and Kankakee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Downey et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05848
Plaintiff:
Jodi A. Downey and Timothy D. Downey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Salazar v. Downey et al
as 3:2012cv02656
Plaintiff:
Jose A Salazar
Defendant:
Deborah D Downey and Cimarron Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Riley v. Chad Kolitwenzew, et al
as 11-3666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW, MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, TIMOTHY BUKOWSKI and others
Donald Sampson v. Michael Downey, et al
as 11-3509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HORACE SAMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. DOWNEY, CHAD KOLITWENZEW, ADAM GRAVES and others
Riley v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2011cv02196
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Riley
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Mr. White, Nurse Charee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downey et al v. American National Property and Casualty Company et al
as 6:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Julie A Downey and James D Downey
Defendant:
American National Property and Casualty Company , American National General Insurance Company and Dennis Rossi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riley et al v. Bukowki et al
as 1:2011cv04269
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Riley
Defendant:
Timothy F. Bukowki, Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskin v. Downey et al
as 2:2010cv02243
Petitioner:
Cortez S Erskin
Respondent:
Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Todd Scholendore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erskin v. Downey et al
as 1:2010cv05306
Plaintiff:
Cortez S Erskin
Defendant:
Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Todd Scholendore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
