Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hamid Hanifi v. Jeff Sessions et al
as 8:2018cv00504
Defendant:
L. Francis Cissna, David Lester, Kirstjen M. Nielse and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Hanifi
Moore v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 5:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Lester Moore
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2017cv00036
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Astrazeneca Pharmaceutiacals LP and others
Plaintiff:
David L Moore and David Lester Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl MDL: Products Liability
ASSAF et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ASSAF and NAZMIEH HAZIME
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Balwinder Kaur, et al v. Elaine Duke et al
as 8:2017cv01686
Defendant:
Elaine C. Duke, Lynn Q Feldman, David Lester and others
Plaintiff:
Balwinder Kaur and Gurmukh Singh
Sovanna Thi Thach v. Jeff Sessions et al
as 8:2017cv01105
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, John F. Kelly, David Lester and others
Petitioner:
Sovanna Thi Thach
David Grohoske v. Larry Berger, et al
as 17-40423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LESTER GROHOSKE
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BERGER, MARICELA RENDON, JOHN DOE, Hill OIG and others
Grohoske v. Fontner et al
as 6:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske
Defendant:
Loni Fontner, Jane Doe, Sgt Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
