Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Sutton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02945
Plaintiff:
David Sutton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Sutton, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 12-1473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SUTTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
David Sutton, Jr. v. Social Security Administration
as 11-2622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SUTTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Kastner v. Intrust Bank, et al
as 11-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
INTRUST BANK, chartered, a professional corporation, C. Q. CHANDLER, individually and as President, Chairman and CEO of Intrust Bank, ROGER W. LEMON, individually and as Former Vice President and Trust Officer of Intrust Bank and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kastner v. Intrust Bank, et al
as 11-3188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
INTRUST BANK, chartered, a professional corporation, C. Q. CHANDLER, individually and as President, Chairman and CEO of Intrust Bank, ROGER W. LEMON, individually and as Former Vice President and Trust Officer of Intrust Bank and others
Ramos v. Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2010cv00184
Defendant:
Officer Harris, David Sutton, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Leonides Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
West v. Detroit Board of Education et al
as 2:2010cv10998
Plaintiff:
Dorothy R West
Defendant:
Detroit Board of Education and David Sutton
Kastner v. Intrust Bank et al
as 6:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Thomas Kastner
Defendant:
Intrust Bank, C.Q. Chandler, Roger W. Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
