Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Tejada v. State of Alaska Department of Correction
as 3:2020cv00102
Petitioner:
Alex Tejada
Respondent:
State of Alaska Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nelson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eric Darnell Nelson
Defendant:
Investigator Rupe, Department of Corrections and Amber Doty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoltenberg et al v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garino, Misipati Solaita, Ole Shangin and others
Defendant:
Nighswonger, Alaska Department of Corrections and Nancy Dahlstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockuk v. Commissioner, Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00261
Petitioner:
Jesse P. Lockuk
Respondent:
Commissioner, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Eugene Sampo v. Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Sampo
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thiele v. Goslin et al
as 3:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Raymond A Thiele
Defendant:
Goslin, Lawrenc, Medical Advisory Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockuk v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jesse Patrick Lockuk
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Petitioner:
Jonathan Walker
Respondent:
Alaska Department of Corrections, William Walker, Jahna Lindemuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Mat-Su-Pre-Trial et al
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Andrew Victor Thomas
Defendant:
Mat-Su-Pre-Trial, Cook Inlet Pre-Trial and Department of Correction's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Watkinson
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, John Conant, Earl Hauser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
