Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 275
Demetrius Wilson v. David Shinn, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16180
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEMETRIUS A. WILSON
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, CENTURION HEALTH OF ADOC, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Corey Hood v. Bureau of Prisons We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6985
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF PRISONS, BELLAMY, Lieutenant, CAUDILL, Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COREY DEANDRE HOOD
Vinson Johnson v. David Shinn, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-15954
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the A.D.O.C.R.R. at Central Office, T. KOPP, Badge No. 3938 C.O. III for the Arizona Department of Corrections at Eyman Complex - Browning Unit and S. BRENNAN, Badge #2304 - Captain, Disciplinary Hearing Officer at Eyman Complex, Browning Unit
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINSON TREMAYNE JOHNSON
Demetrius Wilson v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15840
Defendant / Appellee: BRASCHLER, named as Assistant Deputy Warden Braschler, sued in both individual and official capacity, WINN NGUYEN, #9591, sued in both individual and official capacity, DAVID SHINN, Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEMETRIUS A. WILSON
Heyliger v. Iffert
as 21-1243
Defendant: K. Vilmar, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, J. Phillips, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Vascue, Sergeant; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee: Peacock, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Miller, Superintendent; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Donald Venettozzi, Director of DOCCS Special Housing Inmate Disciplinary Program
Plaintiff / Appellant: Derek A. Heyliger
Christopher Thornsberry v. Roosevelt Barden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2029
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Thornsberry
Defendant / Appellee: Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Judy Taylor, PREA Coordinator, Arkansas Department of Correction, Roosevelt Barden, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Tyrone Shelton v. John Walrath
as 21-6655
Defendant: L. WANG, Prison Physician; All sued in their individual and official capacities, T. COBBS, Registered Nurse, TIM DOMINICK, Physician Assistant; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: S. W. ALLEN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; All sued in their individual and official capacities, DARRELL L. MILLER, Warden; All sued in their individual and official capacities, JOHN WALRATH, Regional Administrator; All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYRONE SHELTON
Joe Baltas v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6590
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER J. MILGRAM, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SERGEANT LITTLE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, UNIT MANAGER ERIC MILLER, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOE BALTAS
Terrance Moore v. Shalla McDowell, et al
as 21-1762
Defendant: Vineshia Barnes, Administrative Specialist, M.S.U. (originally named as Vineshia Barnes), Felicia Bentley, ADC/AC Program Specialist, M.S.U. (Originally named as Felecia Bentley), Falandus Graydon, Lieutenant, M.S.U. (originally named as Graydon) and others
Defendant / Appellee: Scott, Sergeant, Disciplinary Notification Officer, M.S.U., Shalla McDowell, Sergeant, M.S.U. and Daniel Wayne Golden, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC Central Office
Plaintiff / Appellant: Terrance Moore
DaJuan Williams v. Winget, et al
as 21-15601
Defendant / Appellee: VERDUGO, Correctional Officer, COII at ASPC-Eyman, SHERIDAN, Correctional Officer Administrator/Grievance Coordinator, COIV at ASPC-Eyman, VILLANUEVA, #8449; Correctional Officer, Sergeant at ASPC-Eyman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAJUAN WILLIAMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?