Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 86
STEPHENSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01917
Plaintiff: DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON and LONNIE GENE VERNON
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 14-10356
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID CARROLL
Carroll et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv30562
Plaintiff: Theresia Carroll and David Carroll
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ-CANADA v. CARROLL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00217
Plaintiff: ARMANDO LOPEZ-CANADA
Defendant: DAVID CARROLL and ASHLEY LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. David Stephenson
as 13-30148
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
Bey v. Carroll We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01133
Petitioner: Fareed Hasan Bey
Respondent: David Carroll, Pauline H. Tarver and Bob Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. David Stephenson
as 13-30088
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
David Carroll v. Richard Ive
as 13-5335
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN RICHARD IVES
Carroll et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03626
Plaintiff: Shannon L. Carroll and David Carroll
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Stephenson v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 12-35879
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
Respondent - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JOHN DOES, 2-10 and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?