Cases 41 - 50 of 93
De Anda et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv15428
Plaintiff:
Gloria De Anda and Joseph De Anda
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Sanchez De Anda v. Joel Wener
as 17-3038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE A. SANCHEZ DE ANDA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL WENER, Pepin County Sheriff
Rodriguez De Anda v. Aviation Port Services, L.L.C.
as 3:2017cv05340
Plaintiff:
Salvador Rodriguez De Anda
Defendant:
Aviation Port Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Erick de Anda et al v. Herr et al
as 5:2017cv05320
Plaintiff:
Erick De Anda and Enrique de Anda Garcia
Defendant:
Raymond Herr, Taylor Fithian, Kip Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carl E Jones et al v. City of Rialto et al
as 5:2017cv01650
Defendant:
City of Rialto, Randy De Anda and Does
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hice and Carl E Jones
De Anda et al v. Covington Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 7:2017cv00224
Defendant:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company and Brian Wilson
Plaintiff:
Jose De Anda and Elvira De Anda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00168
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00169
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00170
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
