Cases 41 - 50 of 77
English Jr. v. Meyer et al
as 1:2020cv02356
Plaintiff:
Leon English Jr.
Defendant:
Scott A. Meyer, Dulcei, Canman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaster v. Hinshaw et al
as 5:2019cv01705
Defendant:
Brittany Ditzler Hinshaw, Joshua A. Ditzler and Bethany Ditzler Payne
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Jaster and Sheryl Ditzler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Helen Youngblood v. Bd of Comm of Mahoning Cnty, et al
as 19-3877
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY TRAFICANTI, MAHONING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, ROBERT E. BUSH, JR., Director Mahoning County Department of Job and Family Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and as a putative class representative
DITZLER v. 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC et al
as FLN/3:19-CV-02590
Plaintiff:
DITZLER
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
DITZLER v. 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC et al
as 3:2019cv02590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DITZLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DITZLER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv09705
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL DITZLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnson v. Lieutenant Haenitsch, et al
as 18-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT HAENITSCH, OFFICER PHILLIPS, OFFICER RIPSKY and others
Johnson v. Haenitsch et al
as 3:2017cv50383
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Haenitsch, Phillips, Ripsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
