Cases 41 - 50 of 246
Ana E. Garcia Gomez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv06200
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ana E. Garcia Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Patton v. Flores, et al
as 20-55618
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORES, Officer, Counselor / CCII Staff - Commission Committee, L. TERRONEZ, Correctional Officer, MILLER, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATTON
THIEFFRY v. ROSENBERGER et al
as 3:2020cv07224
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, PETER BERGER, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THIEFFRY
LAUGHLIN v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2020cv07150
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, GLENN LURIE, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK LAUGHLIN
Garcia II v. Connon et al
as 1:2020cv00566
Defendant:
Chapplain Brooks, Andrew Jones, Chapplain H. Connon and others
Plaintiff:
Max E. Garcia II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason S. Harmon v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv00388
Defendant:
David Oberst, Dr. Bennie Carter, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harmon and Jason S Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Riley v. Guerrero, et al.
as 1:2019cv01643
Defendant:
M. Garcia, J. Mendez, Guerrero and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmer US, Inc et al v. Simmons et al
as 3:2019cv00907
Plaintiff:
EBI Holdings LLC, ZIMMER US, INC. d/b/a ZIMMER BIOMET, EBI Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Madeleine Trafficanda, Marie Simmons and Karen E. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00356
Defendant:
COMM'R of SOC S ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
MARY E. GARCIA and Mary E Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Antonelli et al
as 3:2019cv00115
Respondent:
B.M. Antonelli, F. Entzel and E. Garcia
Petitioner:
Richard A. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
