Cases 41 - 50 of 400
DIANE EDSON v. PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03581
Plaintiff:
DIANE EDSON
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, AETNA INC., RAWLINGS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
WILD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14972
Plaintiff:
CLINTON EDSON WILD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MACHADO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14424
Plaintiff:
EDSON FERREIRA MACHADO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edson Gelin v. USA
as 22-12561
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDSON GELIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gardner v. Long
as 22-4071
Counter Defendant:
EDSON G. GARDNER
Counter Claimant:
WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Rosa v. Garland
as 22-1523
Petitioner:
EDSON PIRES ROSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Torres et al v. Blue Cargo Freight, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Edson Torres and Edgar Torres
Defendant:
Blue Cargo Freight, LLC, Commercial Innovations Inc., Caribe Interstate Transport, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Zuniga v. Truckmovers International, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Nicole Zuniga
Defendant:
Truckmovers International, Inc., Truckmovers.com, Inc., Dealer's Choice Truckaway System d/b/a Truckmovers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gelin v. Boggs et al
as 6:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Edson Gelin
Defendant:
Emmett Jackson Boggs, Jr. and Michael A. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Edson Santiesteban Garcia
Respondent:
Rachal Chapa and Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
