Cases 41 - 50 of 63
LEWIS V DVA
as 10-7122
Claimant-Appellant:
Earl Lewis, Earl Lewis, Earl Lewis and others
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Langdon v. NCO Financial Systems Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01508
Plaintiff:
Steven Langdon
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems Inc. and Earl Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Faucher et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2010cv01477
Plaintiff:
Michael Faucher and Victoria Faucher
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB, Ocean Mortgage, Earl Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Downstate C.F.
as 1:2010cv04047
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Downstate C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Earl Lewis v.F. Jacquez
as 2:2010cv02071
Respondent:
F. Jacquez
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Lewis
Lewis v. Down State Correctional Facility
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Down State Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. King, et al
as 08-60962
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARL LEWIS ANDERSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RON KING and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Lewis v. American International Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv06109
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Lewis, Walter Earl Lewis and Walter Earl Lewis
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Martin J. Sullivan, Richard Grosiak and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anderson v. King, et al
as 08-60446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL LEWIS ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, LARRY HARDY, D WEST, Captain and others
Lewis v. Quarterman
as 08-40338
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMON EARL LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
