Cases 41 - 50 of 288
Betts v. Varner et al
as 1:2021cv01309
Plaintiff:
Tasai Betts
Defendant:
D. Varner, Kevin Kauffman, J. McCloskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Varner et al
as 1:2021cv00758
Defendant:
D. Varner, A. McCloskey, J. McCloskey and others
Plaintiff:
Tasai M. Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Trust Services LLC, LL Bradford and Company LLC, James Settlement Services, LLC and others
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singh v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv00200
Defendant:
John Wetzel, C.O. Lowe, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Paul Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Live Traffic Data Corp. v. Eberle Design Inc.
as 7:2020cv09585
Defendant:
EBERLE DESIGN INC.
Plaintiff:
LIVE TRAFFIC DATA CORP and Live Traffic Data Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Eberle v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Brian Eberle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Butler, et al v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-3116
Defendant:
BRUCE EWELL, WILLIAM S. WALTERS, Current Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services at SCI-Huntingdon, ANTHONY E. EBERLING, Security Lt. at SCI-Huntingdon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARIFF BUTLER and JEREMEY MELVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Price v. Rosetta Stone Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04641
Defendant:
Kathryn Eberle Walker, Laurence Franklin, Aedhmar Hynes and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Price
EBERLE OBO L.E. v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv13071
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Marshall SAUL
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER EBERLE OBO L.E.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
