Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Edward Dembry v. United State
as 11-2519
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent:
United States of America
USA v. Edward Striley, Jr.
as 11-10129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD KEITH STRILEY, Jr.
Edward Gulbrandson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
as 10-56609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD KEITH GULBRANDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Hannon v. Beard
as 10-1792
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KEITH, RAYMOND COOK, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS HANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL DUFORD, GARY FYFE, ROBERT KOLBER and others
Defendant:
CLARK COLOR LAB and VINCENT MOONEY
Cook et al v. Maloney et al
as 1:2003cv12138
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cook , Francis Hannon , Sean Milliken and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Deorsey , Jeffrey Grimes , Richard Medeiros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edward Dembry v. United States
as 09-3953
Petitioner - Appellant:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Hannon, et al v. Beard, et al
as 09-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS HANNON, RAYMOND COOK, JOSE ALVES and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KEITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, MITT ROMNEY, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner and others
Dembry v. USA
as 4:2009cv00358
Petitioner:
Edward Keith Dembry
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dembry v. USA
as 4:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Edward Keith Dembry
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stote, et al v. Maloney, et al
as 08-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE, FRANCIS HANNON, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE M. MCARTHUR, WAYNE D. CROSBY, STEVEN BALSAVICH and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. MALONEY, PETER ALLEN, GARY FYFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GERI CRISMAN, GURVINDER KAUR JAISWAL and U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
