Cases 41 - 50 of 1,225
Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Tim Kaine, Robert A. Dybing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Edwards v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Stoner v. Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
as 3:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Shane Edward Stoner
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Petersburg Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. Buchanan & Edwards, Inc
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Marysela Gonzalez
Defendant:
Buchanan & Edwards, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Beasley v. Leabough et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Tojuanna Mack, Edward Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davis v. Cooper et al
as 7:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tevin Edward Davis
Defendant:
Sgt. L. Cooper, Capt. Baitert, Capt. Jonathan Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Owens
Defendant:
Berk Artrip, Dentin Hite, Edward Boakye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Myungjin Jung
Defendant:
Sang Keon Lee, Chan Hee Edward Lee and Vincent Jiwoo Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryder v. Edwards et al
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
R. Randall Ryder, Jr.
Defendant:
David P. Edwards, DSS/DCSA and ARBA/BCMR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
