Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Freeman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , C Lillie , R Beyerle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. NRA Group LLC
as 2:2014cv02800
Plaintiff:
Jonna Freeman
Defendant:
NRA Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Freeman v. Credit Protection Association LP
as 2:2014cv02676
Plaintiff:
Jonna Freeman
Defendant:
Credit Protection Association LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Camboni v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv01846
Plaintiff:
Anthony Camboni
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, John Haas, Unknown Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Freeman v. Winn
as 4:2013cv00718
Petitioner:
James Andrew Freeman
Respondent:
Louis Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Freeman v. Apker
as 4:2012cv00635
Petitioner:
James Andrew Freeman
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freeman v. Cirrus Aircraft Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01813
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Freeman
Defendant:
Cirrus Aircraft Corporation , Cirrus Design Corporation and Landmark Aviation Scottsdale Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission et al
as 2:2012cv01211
Plaintiff:
Arizona State Legislature
Defendant:
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission , Colleen Mathis , Linda C McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Holguin v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2012cv00946
Plaintiff:
Artemio Walter Holguin
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Mesa, City of, Mesa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission et al
as 2:2012cv00894
Plaintiff:
Wesley W Harris , LaMont E Andrews , Cynthia L Biggs and others
Defendant:
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Colleen Mathis, Linda C McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
