Cases 41 - 50 of 251
Inthalaphet v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2021cv00557
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Sonny Inthalaphet
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2021cv00715
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Brandlin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Caselas, LLC v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Caselas, LLC
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2021cv00088
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sapaden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04555
Defendant:
Capital One N.A., Barclays US LLC, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts Co., Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC and Luby's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 8:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Brandlin and Jeffrey E. Brandlin
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, a national bank and First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2021at00037
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sapaden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Helbock v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 3:2020cv09500
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Jarron Helbock
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
