Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Berry, et al v. Coastal Communities at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc., et al
as 7:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Donna Berry, William Berry, William Broyles and others
Defendant:
Coastal Communities at Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc. , Coastal Communities at Ocean Ridge Plantation, LLC , Coastal Communities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
ALLEN-BEY v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN-BEY
Defendant:
SHEILA HARRIS, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS OF CHATTANOOGA TENN, FRANK ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN
Defendant:
SHELIA HARRIS and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2014cv00558
Plaintiff:
Cherry Reaves
Defendant:
Amy Fitzgerald, Harriet L. Huell, Carlos Osequeda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PETTIFORD v. USA
as 1:2014cv00785
Petitioner:
MARIO FITZGERALD PETTIFORD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SOUTHERN v. USA
as 1:2014cv00681
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD SOUTHERN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fitzgerald v. Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00159
Defendant:
Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
SOUTHERN v. USA
as 1:2013cv00410
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER FITZGERALD SOUTHERN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
KENNEY v. SHANAHAN
as 1:2013cv00222
Petitioner:
RON FITZGERALD KENNEY
Respondent:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
LAURA ANN FITZGERALD
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
