Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Graham v. Hurst et al
as 5:2013ct03109
Plaintiff:
James R. Graham
Defendant:
Stephen Hurst, Carol Hill and Ernest Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WRAY v. SAUNDER et al
as 1:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Defendant:
SORELL SAUNDER, PAT MCCRORY, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Valdez v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mendez-Valdez
Defendant:
Thomas O'Malley, Kimberly Y. Best, Denzil H. Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Christian Hoel, Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Curran et al
as 5:2013ct03037
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Martha H. Curran, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. DALY SEVEN, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00510
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST JONES
Defendant:
DALY SEVEN, INC. , JON M. DALY, JR. and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tart v. Kornegay et al
as 5:2011ct03236
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Tart
Defendant:
Joyce Kornegay, Forrest Festerman, Janitorial Products Plant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINETTE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2011cv00536
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBINETTE
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03071
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
