Cases 41 - 50 of 186
ROSE v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUHN v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
CODY KUHN
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN, ASHLYNN GONTHIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UTLEY v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. UTLEY
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE VS. HENDRIX ET AL.
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, FRANK VANIHEL, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Howard Garrett
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Director RICHARD BROWN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., BRUCE LEMMON, EDWIN BUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDISON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARDISON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, MATT LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GLENN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
