Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Garrett v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2020cv00619
Petitioner:
Derrick L Garrett
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webster et al v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Scott S Harris, Jacob Levitan, Gregory Frizzell and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arndt et al v. Hatfield et al
as 5:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Taylor Henderson, Barbara Hatfield, Greg Treat and others
Plaintiff:
David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. Austin Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Christopher Born, Carmen Nickel, Brittany Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Webster et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Carlotta Gordon, Sonya Webster, Rick Esser and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Corley et al v. Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC et al
as 4:2019cv00411
Plaintiff:
Corion, LLC and Anna Corley
Defendant:
Garrett Metcalf and Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shoemaker Corporation III, Inc. v. Garrett et al
as 4:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Joshua S Fellman and M Jerome Garrett
Plaintiff:
Shoemaker Corporation III, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Garrett v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv00922
Plaintiff:
Steven Garrett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garrett v. Tymkovech et al
as 4:2018cv00367
Defendant:
Monroe G McKay, Mary Briscoe, Gregory Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Dionne Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sullivan v. Burleson et al
as 6:2018cv00223
Defendant:
Garrett Dunlap, Andy Simmons, AJ Solis, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
