Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Davis v. Richland County et al
as 4:2012cv02057
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
Richland County, Renaldo Myers, Kathryn Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mincy v. Richland County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv00741
Plaintiff:
Therin Tracell Mincy
Defendant:
Richland County Detention Center, Renaldo Myers, M Freely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 3:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Harrell v. McCabe
as 2:2011cv02830
Petitioner:
David Harrell, Jr
Respondent:
Wayne McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunn v. Harrell
as 7:2011cv02440
Plaintiff:
William Dunn
Defendant:
Leslie Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier et al
as 8:2011cv01231
Plaintiff:
Juan Bermea-Cepeda
Defendant:
Chartier, Mims, Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Holmes v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 8:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Holmes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, D Drew, Ms Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Holmes
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Darlene Drew, Tovia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
