Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Hayden v. Hudson et al
as 6:2018cv00387
Defendant:
Kayla Nicholson and David Hudson
Plaintiff:
Harlin Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas-Lira v. Banker et al
as 2:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira
Defendant:
Charles A. Banker, III, Lila Michel Garza and Hayden Head
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 4:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta , Zulema Alaniz , Dennie Albritton and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. Gennex Media, LLC et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:18cv430
as 4:2018cv00883
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hayden
Defendant:
Gennex Media, LLC , Zaappaaz, Inc., Azim Makanojiya and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hayden v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2017cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hayden
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cook v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
as 6:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kerry Max Cook
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas, Smith County, Texas, Eddie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franks v. Tyhan Inc. d/b/a Auto Fix Unlimited et al
as 4:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Franks, Hayden Lee Franks, Nicholas Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Tyhan Inc. d/b/a Auto Fix Unlimited, Tyhan Inc. doing business as Auto Fix Unlimited and Sam Sunny Zamir
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
