Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Holmes v. Nielson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03910
Plaintiff: John Charles Holmes
Defendant: J Nielson, Unknown Party, G Lowenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03841
Plaintiff: Troy Holmes
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03360
Plaintiff: Anna Marie Holmes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holmes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03198
Plaintiff: Lane Holmes
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01554
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Knapp v. Maricopa, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01509
Plaintiff: Jonathan L Knapp
Defendant: Maricopa, County of, Paul Penzone, Joe Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2017cv00834
Plaintiff: Jesse Allen Holmes
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03928
Plaintiff: Melvin E Holmes
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tekelu v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2016cv03650
Plaintiff: Addis Tekelu
Defendant: Yuma, City of, Rodrigo Bacaneri, Yuma, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03492
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Donald Stapley and others
Plaintiff: DeVionn Marquee Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?