Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Snowden v. Yule et al
as 2:2017cv02167
Plaintiff:
Curtis Snowden, III
Defendant:
M. Yule, Mary Housley and Sam H. Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snowden v. Yule et al
as 1:2017cv01387
Plaintiff:
Curtis Snowden, III
Defendant:
M. Yule, Mary Housley and Sam H. Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80180
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-56294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Hubbard v. The Dial Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
Sha'Darius Housley
Defendant:
The Dial Corporation and Dominique Housley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSLEY v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03125
Plaintiff:
SANDRA HOUSLEY
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Housley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Housley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Housley v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01577
Plaintiff:
Stacey Housley
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
