Cases 41 - 50 of 5,151
Scelfo v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Scelfo
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hampton v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024ct03073
Plaintiff:
Michael Quincy Hampton
Defendant:
Sgt. Campbell, Corporal Kraft, Corporal Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. The United States Army et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Forbes
Defendant:
The United States Army and Christine E. Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Payne v. U.S. Army Material Command (AMC) et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ssgt. Timothy Adam Payne
Defendant:
U.S. Army Material Command (AMC), Angelica J. Jennette, Joyce Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kwasny et al v. NewRez, LLC
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard J Kwasny, Jill W Kwasny and Ronald Wisla
Defendant:
NewRez, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Staton et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
J'on Staton and Cree Faulkner
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, Christopher Hicks, Nicholas Kirkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIZEMORE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Randall Sizemore
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vacher v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Mikayla J. Vacher
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
