Cases 41 - 50 of 67
MCCALL v. NEW PRIME, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02442
Plaintiff:
SEAN J. MCCALL
Defendant:
NEW PRIME, INC. , JEFFREY SCHOTTMULLER, MONTRESE LAVONNE-CARTER and others
Cross_claimant:
NEW PRIME, INC.
Cross_defendant:
MONTRESE LAVONNE-CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 12-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Hamilton v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
T Rodriguez, H. Gonzalez, T. Selby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-4011
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B SIMANDLE
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
In re: Tormu Prall, et al
as 11-3640
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
MCCALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39221
Plaintiff:
ALEX J. MCCALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-2578
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Young v. Hedgpeth
as 5:2011cv02739
Plaintiff:
Danny Gerome Young
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, Charles Watson, Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCALL et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60874
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. MCCALL and IRENE RUTH MCCALL
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
