Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Navarro Cardenas et al
as 0:2013cv02356
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Jesus J. Navarro Cardenas , Alfredo Hernandez , John Doe and others
Counter_claimant:
Alfredo Hernandez and Jesus J. Navarro Cardenas
Counter_defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ehly v. Navarro
as 1:2013cv01195
Plaintiff:
William Ehly
Defendant:
J. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Centennial Bank v. West Key Associaties, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv10040
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
West Key Associates, LLC, Joseph Cannova, Ronald J Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro, et al v. Gonzalez, et al
as 7:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ruben Navarro , Gloria Martinez , Yolanda Alvarado and others
Defendant:
City of San Juan, Texas , Chief Juan Gonzalez , Commisioner Eddie Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Salinas
as 2:2010cv03377
Petitioner:
Johnny J. Navarro
Respondent:
S. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osagie v. Metro Dade Corrections Department et al
as 1:2010cv20219
Plaintiff:
Victor Osagie
Defendant:
Metro Dade Corrections Department, J Navarro and Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. Finn
as 2:2009cv01522
Petitioner:
Johnny J Navarro
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Navarro v. Vindiola et al
as 4:2009cv01858
Plaintiff:
John J. Navarro
Defendant:
Vindiola and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beverly v. Navarro et al
as 1:2008cv01105
Plaintiff:
Antoinne Beverly
Defendant:
J. Navarro, Jr., R. A. Gonzalez, M. S. Buslik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navarro v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00342
Petitioner:
Jesus J. Navarro
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
