Cases 41 - 50 of 277
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Neal
as 3:2021cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carson, Sr
Defendant:
Ronald Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowes-Northern v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 3:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Jamie Dimon and Crystal Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowes-Northern v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Jamie Dimon and Crystal Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWES-NORTHERN v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv02574
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JAMIE DIMON and CRYSTAL RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
WEDDLE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WEDDLE
Defendant:
VANIHEL, EWERS, K. FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRALEY v. CLARK COUNTY JAIL INST. et al
as 4:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
HARRISON TEDDY FRALEY, JR.
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY JAIL INST., JAMIE NOLE and GRONDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEELEY v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SEELEY
Defendant:
TALBOT, AGNES OPOKU, HANNAH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKERS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 1:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant:
KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD, JAMIE CONOVER, ALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singh v. Oss et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh
Defendant:
Jamie M Oss, Bethany J Beckman, Lyn M Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
