Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Sevier v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2014cv05380
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo, Eric Schneiderman, Gary R. Herbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEALY et al v. KANE et al
as 2:2013cv04614
Plaintiff:
TERANCE HEALY and TODD M. KRAUTHEIM
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE , LUTHER STRANGE, MICHAEL GERAGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. State of Ohio et al
as 4:2010cv00293
Petitioner:
Charles N. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Ohio Attorney General, U.S. Marshals Service, Northern District of Ohio, R. Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
IMS Health, Inc., et al v. Mill
as 08-1248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IMS HEALTH, INC., VERISPAN, LLC and SOURCE HEALTHCARE ANALYTICS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
JANET T. MILLS
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
