Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Adams v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Larry Dewayne Adams
Defendant:
Mike Mahoney, Dan O'Fallon, Mike McGrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United State
as 10-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raheem Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States, John M. Hillebrecht, (AUSA), Margaret Barnett, (AUSA) and others
Davis v. United States, et al et al
as 1:2010cv00940
Plaintiff:
Raheem Davis
Defendant:
United States, et al, John M. Hillebrecht, Margaret Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quick v. Hodges et al
as 7:2009cv00843
Plaintiff:
William E. Quick
Defendant:
John Hodges, Thomas Belfiore, Demostehenes Long and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hodges v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 8:2008cv01890
Plaintiff:
John Hodges and John Hodges
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bagley v. Higgins et al
as 6:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Shane R Bagley
Defendant:
Haskell Higgins, Cindi Hendrix, Teresa Guest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hodge, John v. FAA, et al
as 08-1107
Petitioner:
John Hodge, First Selectman, Town of New Fairfield
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
State of New Jersey
Heretakis v. New York City Police Officers et al
as 1:2007cv04105
Plaintiff:
Steven Heretakis
Defendant:
New York City Police Officers, "John" Cadichon, "John" Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HANDY v. HODGE et al
as 2:2007cv00174
Plaintiff:
L'TISHA HANDY
Defendant:
JOHN HODGE and BRUNSWICK HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
