Cases 41 - 50 of 534
CORNELIUS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT CORNELIUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bartel et al v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Hope Bartel and Timothy Bartel
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company, Riverstone Building and Consulting, LLC and Jeffrey Scott Lansing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States v. Taylor
as 22-1442
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT TAYLOR, AKA Roach Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Scott Taylor, AKA Jeff Scott Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Taylor, AKA Jeffrey Scott
Kowalski v. Camden County Historical Society
as 2:2022cv04183
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Kowalski
Defendant:
Camden County Historical Society
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
In re: Andramedia Robinson
as 22-13843
Petitioner:
In re: ANDRAMEDIA CHERYL ROBINSON
Respondent:
BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, LORIN BROWN, WAYNE FLETCHER and others
Owens v. Bechtold et al
as 4:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Michelle Weller, Jeffrey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Taylor
as 22-1392
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT TAYLOR
Kailing v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv08037
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Kailing
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Resurgent Capital Services
as 1:2022cv02815
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services L.P. and Resurgent Capital Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jeffrey BradenIn re: Jeffrey Braden
as 22-5936
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY SCOTT BRADEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
