Cases 41 - 50 of 167
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09556
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jose Chavez-Dominguez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60834
Petitioner:
JOSE OSCAR CHAVEZ-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Jose Oscar Dominguez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jurado Jimenez et al v. GLK Foods LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Jurado Jimenez, Edgar Nieto Chavez, Jesus Jurado Ramirez and others
Defendant:
GLK Foods LLC and Ryan A Downs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
United States v. Chavez
as 19-4121
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO CHAVEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Chavez Dominguez v. DHS, et al
as 19-50455
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE OSCAR CHAVEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JUDGE MEREDITH B. TYRAKOSKY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01133
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00181
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01232
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
