Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Daniel Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Es, et al
as 17-17266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL ESTATE, A California State Agency, KYLE THOMAS JONES, TRICIA SOMMERS and others
Ransom v. Hartford Insurance Company Of The Midwest
as 2:2017cv02257
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company Of The Midwest
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thomas Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv02256
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company Of The Midwest and Kyle Thomas Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jeffrey Turner v. Kyle Thomas, et al
as 17-30050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY VENZA TURNER, also known as Jeff Turner
Defendant - Appellee:
KYLE THOMAS, PROGRESSIVE SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, JUDGE LAFITTE and others
Brandon Thomas v. USA
as 16-14955
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON KYLE THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Turner v. Thomas et al
as 5:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Venza Turner
Defendant:
Kyle Thomas, Progressive Security Insurance Co, Lafitte and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al
as 2:2015cv02448
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Department (Bureau) of Real Estate, Kyle Thomas Jones, Tricia Sommers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Ladaile Avery
as 15-20228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LADAILE AVERY, also known as Kyle Thomas
Rozema v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thomas Rozema
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
