Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv61788
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Kramer v. The Presray Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv05650
Defendant:
Pawling Corporation , The Presray Corporation , Jason Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
Kevin Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reuben Lehmann v. USDC-IDB
as 17-70665
:
In re: REUBEN D. LEHMANN
Petitioner:
REUBEN D. LEHMANN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
KEVIN HARRIS, Officer #50899, DANIEL NORRIS, Pros. Attorney and MAHONY, Judge
GAITER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 0:2016cv62755
Plaintiff:
Tony Gaiter , Sedrick Irvin , KEVIN HARRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC, MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reuben Lehmann v. Kevin Harris, et al
as 16-35784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REUBEN D. LEHMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN HARRIS, Officer #50899, DANIEL NORRIS, Pros. Attorney and MAHONY, Judge
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00929
Petitioner:
KEVIN HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. Breg, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01567
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harris
Defendant:
Breg, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnell Lewis, Casper Ingram, Jr, Jesus Molina and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Harri
as 16-1237
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEVIN HARRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
