Cases 41 - 50 of 422
Lusk v. Barber et al
as 1:2022cv02315
Petitioner:
Justice Robert Lusk
Respondent:
Police Officer Barber, Police Officer Alberto Calderon, Police Officer Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lusk v. Gwinnett County Police Department Agency et al
as 1:2022cv01739
Plaintiff:
Justice Robert Lusk
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police Department Agency, Chief Thomas Doran, Officer D.A. Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joseph Lusk
as 22-12078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH FUREY LUSK
Bennett v. County of Lycoming et al
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bennett
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Brad Shoemaker, Matthew McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deontaye Lusk v. Dylon Radtke
as 22-1665
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEONTAYE T. LUSK
Respondent / Appellee:
DYLON RADTKE
Jeffrey Lusk v. Alsata Lamin, et al
as 22-3360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLS LUSK, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Dorothy Jean Ross Lusk, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
ALSATA SALIMATU LAMIN, R.N., CHRISTA J. KING, N.H.A., SHCP FRANKLIN, INC., dba Crowne Pointe Care Center and others
Kinnard v. Navarro et al
as 4:2022cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kinnard
Defendant:
Steve Navarro, Ralph Rogers, Phil Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. Shoemaker et al
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jamal Bennett
Defendant:
Brad Shoemaker and Mark Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lusk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06103
Plaintiff:
James P. Lusk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bressler et al v. Lusk et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Executor:
Heather Bressler
Defendant:
Zachary Lusk and Douglas Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
